Choose the right portfolio format for the evidence
The Portfolio Guide rule is simple: the format should match how a recruiter or hiring manager will review the work. A personal website can work well for design, UX, frontend, writing, product, photography, marketing, and freelance work because it gives the reviewer a quick route through selected evidence. A PDF can work better when you need a controlled, offline, or restricted version. A GitHub profile may support engineering roles, but it usually needs a short explanation of which repositories matter and why.
Do not assume that a more elaborate platform will make weak evidence stronger. A simple PDF with three excellent case studies is better than a polished website full of vague project tiles. Equally, a beautiful design portfolio can fail if it does not explain the brief, your role, the decisions you made, and the outcome.
When choosing the format, ask:
- Will the reviewer understand what to click first?
- Does the format load quickly and work on mobile?
- Can the portfolio be opened without a login?
- Can you tailor or reorder pieces for different roles?
- Can restricted work be protected without making the portfolio feel empty?
- Does the format support accessibility basics, such as readable text, headings, link labels, and alt text?
If you use a portfolio website, check practical accessibility guidance. The W3C WCAG 2.2 standard and the GOV.UK accessibility introduction are useful references when you are building or reviewing a public portfolio site. You do not need to become an accessibility specialist to apply the basics: use real text instead of text embedded in images, add descriptive link labels, keep contrast readable, and make sure the main content can be navigated clearly.